Re: gnome-devel-docs: Some candidates from d.g.o.

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 13:38 +0100, Calum Benson wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-09-02 at 20:19 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > developer.gnome.org has some stuff that still relevant but isn't
> > elsewhere. It's rotting away and isn't convenient for library.gnome.org.
> > 
> > Here is a list of what I've found so far. They could be added to the
> > gnome-devel-docs module. If any of them are horribly updated then we
> > should probably just remove them altogether. I guess we should reply to
> > parts of this CCing the document authors and relevant module
> > maintainers, to discuss it.
> > 
> > * GNOME HIG:
> > http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gup/hig/
> 
> This was moved over to gnome-devel-docs a couple of weeks ago for
> inclusion on library.gnome.org.  I presume somebody will do what's
> necessary at some point to make that version appear on l.g.o, rather
> than the old developer.gnome.org version that it's currently pointing
> at.
> 
> > in svn here:
> > http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/web-devel-2/trunk/content/projects/gup/hig/
> > This is already docbook. There's a lot of other build crap there, but I
> > think most of it doesn't work anyway. 
> 
> Actually, it all works perfectly...

There's some screenshot generation that I'm pretty sure doesn't work.
I'm not worried about it.

>  what other GNOME docbook gives you a
> version with all the diffs from the previous version colour-coded and
> highlighted?! :)  Dunno how we'll get that to work on l.g.o...

That sounds like a general feature that could be added to
library.gnome.org.

-- 
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com