Re: jrb's help ideas
- From: Mikael Hallendal <micke codefactory se>
- To: gnome-doc-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: jrb's help ideas
- Date: 04 Sep 2001 01:04:59 +0000
måndag 2001-09-03 klockan 21.38 skrev Eric Baudais:
> 2) Help needs to be local. This argument goes back to many people not having
> a good internet connection. If I want help on a certain application, I expect
> to click the help button on the application and a window will pop up showing
> me at least some basic help. If my network connection is slow, that help
> could take one minute or more. This will infuriate users because they are
> already frustrated with the application and making them wait so long for the
> help file to be downloaded will make them more angry.
I think he was talking about having a local helpserver providing the
data, so that you don't have to use the Internet to browse it.
> Nautilus is the only program which integrates the help files seamlessly. The
> specification being written is to determine a minimum a web browser needs to
> integrate the help files seamlessly. This will hopefully lead to a lightweight
> browser to be modified or created. A lot of the specification is based on how
> Nautilus integrates the help files. The goal is the specification is to
> encourage other web browsers to integrate GNOME's help files seamlessly.
Yes and this is what I'm doing and I guess others will to and I think
that having a default helpbrowser that is really good at only servering
help and nothing else is the way to go for GNOME/KDE.
Also, one other problem with using a browser is that you can't limit
what a user browses too. I like to see that a user can't browse outside
the help documents. Otherwise a new user might end up anywhere think
that it's still the help documents he/she browses.
> The problem with a local help file server is port 80 will need to be opened
> to listen for requests from the web browser. This is a huge potential security
> risk. Many crackers test port 80, among others, for weaknesses. A help file
> server provides a potential weakness. I believe that a good system
> adminstrator can reduce this risk, but the target GNOME user (newbie with
> minimum computer knowledge) will not even know a potential security risk
> exists.
1) it doesn't need to be on port 80.
2) it could be configured to drop any connections not coming from the
local machine.
Regards,
Mikael Hallendal
--
Mikael Hallendal micke codefactory se
CodeFactory AB http://www.codefactory.se/
Office: +46 (0)8 587 583 05 Cell: +46 (0)709 718 918
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]