Re: Proposal: Image Tag Conventions



Eric -

I like this.

Does this suggest we should produce eps files and put them in cvs as
standard practice?



On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 02:49:30PM -0500, Eric Baudais wrote:
> 
> The move to DocBook 4.1.2 XML has made some changes.  I'd like to propose 
> another such change.  We are currently using the markup:
> 
[snip]
> 
> This applies to all figures regardless of whether they are screenshots, 
> graphics, or other images.
> 
> Proposal:
> We should have 3 different types of markup depending on whether the image 
> is a large figure, a small figure, or a screenshot.  This will utilize the 
> greater flexibility of DocBook 4.1.2 and specify the content of the images 
> more accurately.
> 
[snip]

Could you (assuming there's no raging complaints) work with Sasha to
get examples of each in the template? Also, could you redo the graphics
bits in gnome-doc/gdp/gnome2.xml?

Cheers,
-- 
John Fleck
jfleck inkstain net (h), http://www.inkstain.net/fleck/
"Any man left on the Rio Grande is the King of the World as far as I know."
 - Becker and Fagen, 1973



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]