Re: Proposal: Image Tag Conventions
- From: John Fleck <jfleck inkstain net>
- To: GNOME Documentation Project <gnome-doc-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Proposal: Image Tag Conventions
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 20:47:49 -0600
Eric -
I like this.
Does this suggest we should produce eps files and put them in cvs as
standard practice?
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 02:49:30PM -0500, Eric Baudais wrote:
>
> The move to DocBook 4.1.2 XML has made some changes. I'd like to propose
> another such change. We are currently using the markup:
>
[snip]
>
> This applies to all figures regardless of whether they are screenshots,
> graphics, or other images.
>
> Proposal:
> We should have 3 different types of markup depending on whether the image
> is a large figure, a small figure, or a screenshot. This will utilize the
> greater flexibility of DocBook 4.1.2 and specify the content of the images
> more accurately.
>
[snip]
Could you (assuming there's no raging complaints) work with Sasha to
get examples of each in the template? Also, could you redo the graphics
bits in gnome-doc/gdp/gnome2.xml?
Cheers,
--
John Fleck
jfleck inkstain net (h), http://www.inkstain.net/fleck/
"Any man left on the Rio Grande is the King of the World as far as I know."
- Becker and Fagen, 1973
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]