Re: Where we'll put docs for control-center

[Aaron Weber <aaron ximian com>]

Kevin--
 Well, if it's done right, it'll be installed readably for everyone, and
linked properly to make that work.  I think. 

If not, well, gnome-help-browser is deprecated. Use Nautilus. I know
it's too slow, especially on old hardware.  But we really need to start
using our tools more. You must eat your own dogfood. If we all find it
unbearable to use our own docs browser, we're in a lot of trouble.

a.

On 09 Aug 2001 10:27:59 -0500, Kevin Breit wrote:
> On 10 Aug 2001 09:36:58 -0400, Alexander Kirillov wrote:
> > 
> > The only comment is that IIRC, it was decided that for the sake of
> > uniformity, we better use "help", not "doc" as the name of CVS
> > directory to put documentation in. Similarly, figures go to "figures",
> > not "figs". 
> > 
> > Also: probably,  help shouldn't be linked to html file
> > directly: it should call help browser with appropriate
> > application name/section , and Nautilus will
> > do sgml->html rendering on the fly. But developers - and people like
> > jfleck and muet -  know all this much better than me.
> 
> Ugh.  You're pulling all my old conventions out from under me :)
> 
> What do we do about those people who use ghb (myself included)?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Kevin Breit
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-doc-list mailing list
> gnome-doc-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
-- 
"Neque porro quisquam est qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet,
consectetur, adipisci velit . . ."  Cicero