Re: 1.4 updates
- From: Alexander Kirillov <kirillov math sunysb edu>
- To: gnome-doc-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: 1.4 updates
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 16:00:36 -0400
I have two comments. First, I'd like this thing - replacing
feedback address by some common entity - to be discussed by developers
- it is not to us to decide. E.g., maybe some developers want all
feedback be sent ot them, not to Sun or HP, even by people who bought
a copy of Gnome with Solaris. In particular, I'll not change the
feedback address in gnome-terminal docs until I get OK from Miguel.
Second: Dan, you got me lost with all these entity things. The only
entites you can declare in sgml files are either "public" ones - the
ones listed in catalog file - or those for which you provide absolute
path, no env. variables allowed. You can not declare an entity using
$PREFIX. Or at least so I thought. Can anyone clarify this??
The only solution I see is that you use $PREFIX in sgml file as it is
in cvs, and during build time, 'make' replaces this by appropriate
path. So in sgml files shipped with binary packages, there will be no
$PREFIX.
Sasha
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 10:39:40AM -0500, Dan Mueth wrote:
>
> Michael has a good idea here. We should do this by declaring system-wide
> entities which fill in some of this boiler-plate text. In his example, we
> would need two entities, one for the doc comments/bugs and one for the app
> comments/bugs. Not only does this make it easy for Sun to have its
> customers send bug reports to them if it likes (we will need to separately
> discuss how to share bug databases), it also makes it easier for the GDP
> to update all of its docs simulataneously. We should similarly produce an
> entity which we use in the license section at the end of each doc.
>
> How should we do this? We could use parameter entities in the DTD, but we
> should very strongly avoid this IMO since it means we are no longer
> strictly DocBook-compliant. So, unless I'm missing something, we have to
> use external entities. Two methods come to mind here. One is to specify
> an absolute path for the entity. I don't think this is viable since we
> can't maintain the same absolute path on all systems. So, I think we have
> to use symbolic links which are created at install time. For example, we
> may have an entity 'docbugsblurb.sgml' in $PREFIX/help/entities and then
> make a symbolic link from every $PREFIX/<docname>/<languagename>/ to
> it. I don't like this a lot, but I don't see any better solutions. If my
> memory is correct, this is also how KDE does it.
>
> These entities should be installed by gnome-core or gnome-libs, as with
> the GFDL and GPL docs. (I forget which package we decided on.)
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Dan
>
>
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Michael McElree - Sun Ireland - Tech Writer wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > One suggestion I would like to see
> > implemented involves a (minor) change to the Authors section
> > of
> > online help.
> >
> > It is very important for Sun (and for other companies
> > distributing GNOME in the future) that users are given a link
> > to a
> > page listing the appropriate support channel. Thus, GNOME on
> > Solaris users who need further support or information on any
> > of
> > the core software would be given a link to a Sun-specific
> > contact
> > information page. In this way, each distribution of GNOME
> > would
> > direct users to the appropriate channel to obtain further
> > support. Each distributor of GNOME would only have to insert
> > the
> > relevant information on one page, rather than trying to change
> > the help for every piece of software.
> >
> > To take the example of the Mini-Commander applet - the Authors
> > section would read:
> >
> > Mini-Commander was written by Oliver Maruhn
> > (<oliver maruhn com>). Please send all comments and
> > suggestions
> > via the following channels <link to relevant support details
> > page>.
> >
> > This manual was written by Oliver Maruhn (<oliver maruhn com>)
> > Minor modifications and updates were made by Dan Mueth
> > (<d-mueth chicago edu>). Please send all comments and
> > suggestions
> > via the following channels <link to relevant support details
> > page>.
> >
> > The default link would be to a page containing the text in the
> > current form. Sun (and other distributors) would replace this
> > page with one listing their own support contact details.
> >
> > Regards
> > Michael
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-doc-list mailing list
> gnome-doc-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]