RE: 1.4 updates
- From: Gregory Leblanc <GLeblanc cu-portland edu>
- To: 'Dan Mueth' <d-mueth uchicago edu>, Michael McElree - Sun Ireland - Tech Writer <Michael McElree ireland sun com>
- Cc: gnome-doc-list gnome org
- Subject: RE: 1.4 updates
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 10:17:32 -0700
Caution, heavy duty snippage ahead.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Mueth [mailto:d-mueth uchicago edu]
>
> Michael has a good idea here. We should do this by declaring
[snip]
> How should we do this? We could use parameter entities in
> the DTD, but we
> should very strongly avoid this IMO since it means we are no longer
> strictly DocBook-compliant. So, unless I'm missing something,
I agree with that reasoning, we've already made trouble when we used the
Gnome PNG variant (I still have to remember to re-install that when I build
a new machine), and I think we really need to avoid this, if at all
possible. Can we get the templates updated for DocBook 4 Doctype
declarations, or is that premature?
> we have to
> use external entities. Two methods come to mind here. One
> is to specify
> an absolute path for the entity. I don't think this is
> viable since we
> can't maintain the same absolute path on all systems. So, I
> think we have
> to use symbolic links which are created at install time. For
> example, we
> may have an entity 'docbugsblurb.sgml' in
> $PREFIX/help/entities and then
> make a symbolic link from every $PREFIX/<docname>/<languagename>/ to
> it. I don't like this a lot, but I don't see any better
> solutions. If my
> memory is correct, this is also how KDE does it.
>
> These entities should be installed by gnome-core or
> gnome-libs, as with
> the GFDL and GPL docs. (I forget which package we decided on.)
>
> Thoughts?
Sounds great to me, especially since this will make changes like the ones
that John and I have been working on (the gnome-help:gpl/fdl) much easier.
Greg
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]