RE: XSL/XSLT (was Re: A thought:)
- From: Gregory Leblanc <GLeblanc cu-portland edu>
- To: 'Ali Abdin' <aliabdin aucegypt edu>
- Cc: GDP <gnome-doc-list gnome org>
- Subject: RE: XSL/XSLT (was Re: A thought:)
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 13:03:33 -0800
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ali Abdin [mailto:aliabdin aucegypt edu]
>
> * Gregory Leblanc (GLeblanc cu-portland edu) wrote at 22:44
> on 28/11/00:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ali Abdin [mailto:aliabdin aucegypt edu]
> > >
> > > 2) The server applies an XSL style sheet to an XML document
> > > to transform it
> > > to some other format (generally HTML) and sends the
> > > transformed document to
> > > the client (Web browser).
> >
> > Cocoon and gnome-db2html2 are here.
>
> What is Cocoon?
Oh, good point. Take a look at http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/ for some more
info.
> Also - some of the difficult things we do in C
> (gnome-db2html2) looks like
> they can be more easily done in XSLT (especially since we use
> the SAX API (and
> not DOM))
Cool. I'm really looking forward to post-1.4 for docs people, it will give
us an opportunity to change a few things, and add a bunch of versatility to
our docs (I hope). We've still got a lot to do before 1.4 is ready though
(yeah, I'm reading mail instead of working)
> > > 3) A third program transforms the original XML document into
> > > some other
> > > format (often HTML) before the document is placed on the
> > > server. Both server
> > > and client only deal with the post-transform document.
> >
> > db2html is here.
>
> db2html is too slow. I am talking about "run-time"
> transformation (we won't
> know until we get decent tools for it).
But option 3 above is NOT a run-time solution. It's a "build time"
solution, which is what db2html is. I don't think it's a good idea, but I
think that's what it's talking about. Later,
Greg
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]