RE: Drake's #docs Dialogue
- From: Gregory Leblanc <GLeblanc cu-portland edu>
- To: "'Eric Baudais'" <drake x8b4e541f dhcp okstate edu>, gnome-doc-list gnome org
- Subject: RE: Drake's #docs Dialogue
- Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2000 01:42:04 -0800
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Baudais [mailto:drake@x8b4e541f.dhcp.okstate.edu]
> Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2000 12:45 AM
> To: gnome-doc-list@gnome.org
> Subject: Drake's #docs Dialogue
>
> 7) Steve George made the point that editors can create a catherdal
> structure, which we want to avoid. The editors could become
> a restricted
> and elite "inner circle" of the GDP controlling which docs
> get committed.
> I think this can be avoided by giving the doc authors a
> choice to either
> ask an editor to check their documentation, asking another "learned"
> member of the GDP to go over their doc, or send the
> documentation to the
> gnome-doc-list to check for clarity and correct DocBook markup.
Could somebody explain this a bit more for me? From my interpretation of
the above, it sounds like there are some different ideas of the roles of
editors, and I just want to clarify what people are thinking. Thanks,
Greg
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]