Re: GDP Handbook

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Telsa Gwynne <hobbit@aloss.ukuu.org.uk> writes: 
> There seems to be an unspoken "GPL your doc" hint, largely because
> practically every example I've found is GPL'd. Question for the applet
> handbook: is the whole thing to go under one licence, or can people
> pick different licences for their different contributions? I'm happy
> with GPL personally, but people differ: I also like the Open Content
> one, and GNU are preparing a GNU documentation licence, too. GNOME
> is the GNU network whatever it is, so I assume that GNUy licences 
> make sense :)
> 

The official GNOME docs should definitely be under a free license.

I still think the GPL is sort of a bad license for docs; I would use
the simple license GNU has sometimes used on docs, or the Open
Publication License without the non-free "options".

Havoc