Re: Sect tags



> * Karl Eichwalder (keichwa@gmx.net) wrote at 02:43 on 06/08/00:

	A clever rigorous technical solution to requiring id's
	on all sect's

> > Ali Abdin <aliabdin@aucegypt.edu> wrote:

> 
> So this is a 'per-document' thing? It seems a pain to require authors to
> include this all the time. 
>  

I'll defer to those more expert than myself in the ways of docbook on
the merits of Karl's solution. Seems like a good technical approach,
though I agree with Ali that it has practical drawbacks.

In the interim, however, I've gone through and fixed the sects so they
all have id's and put up a new set of both sgml and xmls (I broke 'em
up into two tarballs this time, one with xmls and one with matching
sgmls for comparison).

linked off the web page:
http://www.inkstain.net/fleck/gdp.html

http://www.inkstain.net/fleck/sgmlkit.tar.gz
http://www.inkstain.net/fleck/xmlkit.tar.gz

Cheers,
-- 
John Fleck
jfleck@inkstain.net (h)
jfleck@abqjournal.com (w)
http://www.inkstain.net/fleck/
http://www.abqjournal.com/scitech/




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]