Vivien,
I'd would like to see GDA 5.2 Vala bindings at valadoc.org,
they have an old 4.0 version, then could you check way Rico
states that: " The API
isn't in sync between the ldap-provider and internal
ldap-interface."
Rico, could you expand your explanation about " ...
g-ir-scanner seems to be caught in this LDAP stuff ...", in
order to take a shot about, may be providing building messages
output, please?
---------- Forwarded message
----------
From: Rico Tzschichholz
<ricotz t-online de>
Date: 2014-10-10 7:22 GMT-05:00
Subject: Re: Gda bindings in vala-girs
To: Daniel Espinosa < esodan gmail com>
I send this again since I didn't receive an answer for
the proposed changes.
There is no real difference between vala 0.26 and
master git yet.
Vala is doing the right thing here apart from
barfing about some
characters in the gir.
Although g-ir-scanner seems to be caught in this
LDAP stuff. The API
isn't in sync between the ldap-provider and internal
ldap-interface.
See
https://git.gnome.org/browse/libgda/commit/?h=LIBGDA_5.2&id=6d02929e798ba6f71e9a6acde2c11f6c5c2dc996
And this gmodule/dlopen mechanism is probably a
problem too for g-i.
I don't know why the "cnc" property still isn't
picked up here.
Am 01.10.2014 um 04:59 schrieb Daniel Espinosa:
> I've used updated jhbuild
to build GDA and Vala 0.26, stable from 0.26
> branch.
>
> I see you use Vala 0.28, is this the way? Is
not better to use stable
> branches?
>
> In my box I found differences, attached, please
review before to commit.
>
> 2014-09-30 8:29 GMT-05:00 Rico Tzschichholz
<ricotz t-online de
> <mailto: ricotz t-online de>>:
>
> Hi,
>
> Yeah it is useful and wanted to use the
latest available versions to
> generated these bindings to pick up
bug-fixes and such. Purposely using
> valac 0.22 is not a good idea ;-)
>
> I have pushed updates to catch up with the
g-i changes.
> Besides that I added the needed
configure-flags to have the needed files
> generated in jhbuild by default.
>
> https://git.gnome.org/browse/jhbuild/commit/?id=a5b7742150c0debe89f6640f7e9351859f8d1a02
>
> This way it will get updated in the
progress of our/my usual jhbuild
> update of girs/vapis.
>
> Regards,
> Rico
>
> Am 30.09.2014 um 15:17 schrieb Daniel
Espinosa:
> > Thanks forma your advise :-)
> >
> > I would like to maintain this files
because I'm the maintainer in
> > libgda. I've used 0.22, because is
that version available when 5.2 was
> > realized; I'm using 5.2 branch too.
> >
> > Then valadoc.org
< http://valadoc.org>
< http://valadoc.org>
policy
> is to use latest version of
> > vala and GObject Introspection?
> >
> > If so, we need to use non released
distribution, use jhbuild or wait and
> > update my box to latest distribution
using GNOME 3.14 now a days.
> >
> > El sep 30, 2014 3:17 AM, "Rico
Tzschichholz" <ricotz t-online de
<mailto:ricotz t-online de>
> > <mailto: ricotz t-online de
<mailto: ricotz t-online de>>>
escribió:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I noticed your commit/merge to
vala-girs. Your build
> environment seems
> > to be pretty outdated and
therefore your reverted quite a lot
> of changes
> > in Gda-5.0.gir. If you are
pushing things there make sure you
> are using
> > an up2date system since e.g.
valac-0.22, which you used, is
> quite old.
> >
> > I am going to update the related
files based on "LIBGDA_5.2"
> branch
> > https://git.gnome.org/browse/libgda/log/?h=LIBGDA_5.2
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rico
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> Trabajar, la mejor arma para tu superación
> "de grano en grano, se hace la arena" (R) (en
trámite, pero para los
> cuates: LIBRE)
--
Trabajar, la mejor arma
para tu superación
"de grano en grano, se hace la arena" (R) (en trámite,
pero para los cuates: LIBRE)
_______________________________________________
gnome-db-list mailing list
gnome-db-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
|
