Re: [gnome-db] ABI break in GDA 5.1 vs 5.0?

[Daniel Espinosa <esodan gmail com>]

Ok. I'll remove non public API from GIR/Vala bindings.

2013/6/2 Vivien Malerba <vmalerba gmail com>

Hi Daniel!

You've got a point there; however this symbol (along with some others) are not "published" as they are not in any of the .h file which are distributed, this is why they were "hidden".

So you're right, technically it's an ABI break, however I don't see how one could have used them without knowing they were not published, so I don't think this is really a problem.

See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=669801 for more information.

Regards,

Vivien

On 2 June 2013 14:51, Daniel Espinosa <esodan gmail com> wrote:

I found that object GdaDataModelDsnList have changed its gda_data_model_dsn_list_get_type method to _gda_data_model_dsn_list_get()

Note the prefix "_".

AFAIK this is an API break. This make that GI detects it as a class in 5.0, but a record in 5.1.

--
Trabajar, la mejor arma para tu superación
"de grano en grano, se hace la arena" (R) (en trámite, pero para los cuates: LIBRE)

_______________________________________________
gnome-db-list mailing list
gnome-db-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list

--
Trabajar, la mejor arma para tu superación
"de grano en grano, se hace la arena" (R) (en trámite, pero para los cuates: LIBRE)