Re: [gnome-db] libgda 4.2.x doesn't compile anymore in debian unstable

[Andrea Zagli <azagli libero it>]

Il giorno mer 24 lug 2013 16:57:46 CEST, Daniel Espinosa ha scritto:

> 2013/7/24 Andrea Zagli <azagli libero it>
>
> > Il giorno mar 23 lug 2013 20:19:15 CEST, Daniel Espinosa ha scritto:
> >
> >  Hi Andrea,
> > > Yes this is a problem with resent GObject Introspection. I've managed to
> > > fix the same problem for libgda-5.0.4 version.
> > >
> > > Exists interest in libgda-4.0? This is important to know if is better to
> > > work on that banch.
> > >
> > > Is it more stable than 5.0?
> >
> >
> > i often develop under gnu/linux and then i compile under windows (i prefer
> > to compile under windows instead of cross compile...)
> >
> > i still develop with 4.2.x because 5.x depends on gtk 3 and gtk 3 under
> > windows, that i know, isn't yet stable (i'll try asap new version)
>
> Are you using GTK+ widgets on GDA for your applications or just libgda?


yes i use some widgets


> [...]

> >
> Why are you using resent version of GObject Introspection? AFAIK is better
> to use version released at the time GDA 4.2 was in order to avoid conflicts
> like the one you've found.

i'm using what i find in the distro


> If you aren't using GObject Introspection and GDA-UI (Gtk+ widgets) at all,
> may you can use following switches:
>
> ./configure --without-ui --disable-gda-gi --disable-gdaui-gi
>
> They allows you to compile without that dependencies.


ok i tried with --disable-*-gi and it seems to work


at the same time i'm trying the gtk3 and libgda5 status under win...  
and it seems a good state ;-)


thanks a lot



> >  LibGDA-5.0.x is included in Debian Wheezy, I'm working to fix most of bugs
> > > reported against GObject Introspection and Vala bindings.
> > >
> > > Upcoming LibGDA-5.2 have lot of fixes on GObject Introspection and Vala
> > > bindings, make it more usable for other languages.
> > >
> > > Do I need to backport them?
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/7/23 Andrea Zagli <azagli libero it>
> > >
> > >  the problem seems to be gir (1.36.0-2+b1)
> > > > thanks in advance
> > > > [...]