Re: [gnome-db] postgresql provider performance
- From: Mark Johnson <mrj001 shaw ca>
- To: Vivien Malerba <vmalerba gmail com>
- Cc: gnome-db-list <gnome-db-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [gnome-db] postgresql provider performance
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:46:15 -0700
Mark Johnson wrote:
Vivien Malerba wrote:
  
On Jan 30, 2008 4:04 PM, Mark Johnson <mrj001 shaw ca> wrote:
  
    
But what information does it provide?  Here is a sample session from psql:
issue001_db=# \d+ slots
                         Table "public.slots"
      Column       |          Type          | Modifiers | Description
-------------------+------------------------+-----------+-------------
 slot_id           | integer                | not null  |
 obj_guid          | character(32)          | not null  |
 name              | character varying(500) | not null  |
 slot_type         | integer                | not null  |
 int64_val         | bigint                 |           |
 string_val        | character varying(500) |           |
 double_val        | bigint                 |           |
 timespec_val      | date                   |           |
 guid_val          | character(32)          |           |
 numeric_val_num   | bigint                 |           |
 numeric_val_denom | bigint                 |           |
Indexes:
    "slots_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (slot_id)
Has OIDs: no
issue001_db=# SELECT 1 FROM pg_catalog.pg_class c,
pg_catalog.pg_constraint c2, pg_catalog.pg_attribute a WHERE c.relname =
'slots' AND c.oid = c2.conrelid and a.attrelid = c.oid and c2.contype =
'P' and c2.conkey[1] = a.attnum and a.attname = 'slot_id';
 ?column?
----------
(0 rows)
There is not a single row returned by this query.  'slot-id' is the
primary key column, which seems to be something this query might be
looking for.  Does this possibly behave differently in an older version
of PostgreSQL?  I am using 8.2.6.
    
      
I believe the information is in the existence of a row returned or no.
  
    
The c2.contype='P' test checks if the column is a primary key.  This 
alternates with checking the columns for a unique key ('u').  However, 
the query is returning zero rows regardless of the presence or absence 
of a primary or unique key.  In the above instance, the column is a 
primary key as shown by the \d+ command.  When I tried columns that are 
not primary keys, they return the same results.  I believe, therefore, 
that there is a problem with this query.
  
Found the problem. See bug513543:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=513543
The 'P' should be 'p'.
Mark
[
Date Prev][Date Next]   [
Thread Prev][Thread Next]   
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]