Re: [gnome-db] 3.1.5 Release?
- From: Armin Burgmeier <armin arbur net>
- To: Vivien Malerba <vmalerba gmail com>
- Cc: gnome-db-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [gnome-db] 3.1.5 Release?
- Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:29:17 +0200
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 22:05 +0200, Vivien Malerba wrote:
> 2008/7/22 Armin Burgmeier <armin arbur net>:
> > On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 10:26 +0200, Vivien Malerba wrote:
> >> 2008/7/20 Armin Burgmeier <armin arbur net>:
> >> > I recently committed the patches for bugs #510739 and #503321 to the
> >> > libgda-3-2 branch. They have been applied to trunk, but are currently
> >> > not available for 3.x, and they make it easier to build and use libgda
> >> > on Windows. Could we have a 3.1.5 release for this?
> >> >
> >>
> >> Ok, I'll do it ASAP (I hope tonight), or you can do it before if you want.
> >
> > I tried, but one of the checks during make distcheck fails:
> >
> > FAIL: check_data_proxy
> > ========================================
> > 1 of 3 tests failed
> > Please report to gnome-db-list gnome org
> > ========================================
> >
> > I guess the problem was this:
> >
> >>>> END OF TEST Set prepend-null-entry to FALSE (with chunk)
> > 75%: Checks: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 1
> > ../../../tests/data-models/check_data_proxy.c:115:E:Test read
> > write:test6:0: (after this point) Test timeout expired
> > Running suite(s): Test
> >
> > though I am not sure what the exact problem is or how to fix it.
>
> Sorry I had forgotten about it...
>
> I don't think I'll have the time to look into what the problem here is
> because the code has changed a lot with the V4 in preparation, and
> finding the bug would probably mean spend a lot of time and because I
> prefer to spend that time on stabilizing the V4 (I'm still optimistic
> about having a stable API by September).
>
> So I can either make a release where the "make check" fails, or not
> make the release (anyway the modification for that version certainly
> did not add any bug related to the test failing).
>
> Tell me,
>
> Vivien
I simply tried distcheck again and it did terminate successfully this
time. Those test seems to rely on an operation to finish in a given
amount of time, which it did not last time. Perhaps my machine was under
load, or something. I just did the 3.1.5 release.
Thanks,
Armin
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]