Re: [gnome-db] API Changes



2007/1/12, Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>:
On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 14:17 -0600, Daniel Espinosa wrote:
> I plan to do the following API changes:
>
> In libgda:
>
> gda_query_field_is_parameter to gda_query_field_get_is_parameter
>
> gda_entity_field_get_g_type to gda_entity_field_get_data_type

Sounds good to me.


I'm preparing the patch...

> A sugestion:
>
> Could I move the gda_dict_field_set_dict_type as a virtual method in
> GdaEntityField (as a gda_entity_field_set_dict_type)?
> This is to avoid some errors in API autogeneration in C# bindings
> (there are other methods to avoid this using Gda.metadata rules, then
> this isn't a problem).

Is this because two functions seem to have the same name?


The actual implementation confuse Mono auto code generator... but this
is a real concern, I'm fixing some API issues in some objects...
--
Trabajar, la mejor arma para tu superación
"de grano en grano, se hace la arena" (R) (entrámite, pero para los
cuates: LIBRE)



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]