Re: [gnome-db] API Changes
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: Daniel Espinosa <esodan gmail com>
- Cc: gnome-db-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [gnome-db] API Changes
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:01:13 +0100
On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 14:17 -0600, Daniel Espinosa wrote:
> I plan to do the following API changes:
>
> In libgda:
>
> gda_query_field_is_parameter to gda_query_field_get_is_parameter
>
> gda_entity_field_get_g_type to gda_entity_field_get_data_type
Sounds good to me.
> A sugestion:
>
> Could I move the gda_dict_field_set_dict_type as a virtual method in
> GdaEntityField (as a gda_entity_field_set_dict_type)?
> This is to avoid some errors in API autogeneration in C# bindings
> (there are other methods to avoid this using Gda.metadata rules, then
> this isn't a problem).
Is this because two functions seem to have the same name?
--
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]