Re: [gnome-db] 2.0



2005/9/15, Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>:
> On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 10:23 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > > I'm going to release 2.0 soon, so please if you have something that
> > > needs to go in, let me know so that I wait till you commit it
> >
> > Have you decided that this should not be dealt with?:
> > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-db-list/2005-August/msg00031.html
> >
> > It would be very difficult to fix it later without breaking applications
> > that depend on the broken behaviour.
> >
> for #310226, I think guchar is the best thing, since binary is composed
> of bytes. So, could you please resend your patch using guchar?

I'll take care of that bug because I've already made some local
modifications to the gda_value_[gs]et_binary() functions.



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]