On mer, 2004-07-21 at 05:54 -0300, Gustavo R. Montesino wrote: > > hmm, what other licenses? > > GPL would be the ideal. > > > AFAIK, we are using the same license as the rest of GNOME, are we not? > > I've done some browsing and, although most GNOME documentations seems to > be GFDL, it doesn't seems to be mandated by the GNOME Foundation. > Actually, I didn't find even recomendations... Did I miss it? I found that most API documentations on the GNOME website are licensed under the LGPL. Generally, you are best served if you license the documentation and the software under the same license. A GPL/GFDL dual licensing is also a good option. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : josselin mouette ens-lyon org `. `' joss debian org `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=