Re: [gnome-db] GnomeDbForm



On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 08:25, Paisa Seeluangsawat wrote:
> Rodrigo,
> 
> If you could reply on record updating syntax, that would be cool.
>
just answered. Sorry for the delay, but I am travelling today, and I've
been quite busy preparing the trip

>   I
> would like to edit/re-submit my previous patch before the CVS changes
> too much.
> 
> About the is_null issue, I've given it a bit more thought and still
> only see good (albeit small) things in having NULL as a value.  But
> this could just be a human trait of not seeing flaws in his own idea.
> I realize that this will break lots of current code.  However trivial
> the fix is, it's still inconvenient for old users.  It'll be up to you
> when this will get implemented...if ever.
> 
I agree with the solution, and with the problem it might impose. In any
case, if we want to do it, now is the time, before we really freeze for
1.2.

If nobody says nothing against it, please go ahead and implement it.

cheers




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]