Re: [gnome-db]New report IDL proposal

[Carlos Perelló Marín <carlos gnome-db org>]

On 20 Apr 2001 12:06:58 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On 19 Apr 2001 18:06:17 +0200, Carlos Perelló Marín wrote:
> > Well, here you have the new IDL proposal ;-)
> > 
> > 
> > I think that it only lacks on exception stuff for error handling, I
will
> > work now on it, but please review the actual one and tell us what do
you
> > think about it and which things do you think that needs to be
> > added/removed.
> > 
> > 
> > As you could see the IDL reflects the actual DTD, so if someone
modifies
> > it, the IDL must also be updated.
> > 
> > Questions, ideas, help???
> > 
> ok, just some comments:
> * use a prefix for all enums, to avoid namespace collissions. That is,
> for FontWeight, use FONT_WEIGHT_LIGHT, FONT_..., for Source,
> SOURCE_INTERN, ...
> * also, name all interfaces, structs, etc, Report*, that is, append
> Report to all names. If not, ORBit-generated names won't be too
helpful
> for some stuff, and might even conflict with some libgda-defined stuff
> * now that you're at it, please remove all ReportConverter stuff,
since
> we don't need it anymore.
> 


All done.

> for the rest, it seems ok to me, so please make these modifications
and
> commit.
> 



I will commit it now, thanks for all.

Anyone who want make other suggestions about the IDL?

> cheers
> -- 
> Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org> <rodrigo ximian com>
> http://www.gnome-db.org/



-- 
Carlos Perelló Marín
mailto:carlos gnome-db org
mailto:carlos hispalinux es
http://www.gnome-db.org
http://www.Hispalinux.es
Valencia - España