Re: New ideas about the report engine :-)

[Carlos Perello Marin <carlos hispalinux es>]

> > Well, i have thinking another time about the report engine, and i think
> > that we could define all the report objects at the IDL file
> > (GdaReportObject, GdaReportLine, GdaReportPicture, etc.) then the only
> > doubt i had was: who could we derivate from GtkObject?, the i go to the
> > IRC at #gnome and Miguel tell me that the best thing we could do is use
> > the BonoboObject as our base class, and i will do it (if you don't have
> > any trouble, of course).
> > 
> > 
> No, you shouldn't use BonoboObject for the report part, since although
> Bonobo has been now splitted into a X and a non-X libraries, using
> Bonobo makes a program depend on gnome-libs, so this is not what we
> want.
> 

Sorry, Rodrigo, but as Miguel de Icaza told me at the IRC, Bonobo will
be Gnome independent (and somewhere at gnome site I also read it), then
i don't know why you said that. Bonobo will be Gnome independent and X
independent. At this moment it depends on Gnome because the GtkObject
(as libgda).

> It should use GtkObject (GObject when GLib 2.0 is out) instead.
> 

Bonobo will do the same as libgda, i don't understand why we shouldn't
use it.

> cheers
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-db-list mailing list
> gnome-db-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list