Re: debian packages in

>>>>> On 30 Nov 2000 10:37:26 -0100,
>>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org> wrote:

RM> On 30 Nov 2000 20:23:55 +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote:
>> >>>>> On 29 Nov 2000 22:59:39 -0100,
>> >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org> wrote:
>> Is debian's potato tree provide gnome-db?
>> That can't probably be here. because potato doesn't include
>> bonobo, and potato's GNOME is October GNOME. it's too old.
>> even if we provide the potato's gnome-db, I think that it
>> isn't almost different from woody.
RM> ok, so what do you suggest? to just have in the woody
RM> debs so that people can download them? or not have a debian/ directory
RM> at all?

Hmm, I don't know which well. if it's meaningful that we
provide debs on, I think that we might
provide it.

Well, we put debs on in the meantime, and
we check the number of user. if it isn't meaningful, we
don't have it.

Do you think it?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]