Re: Thoughts on GNOME Continuous improvements





On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 12:00 PM Javier Jardón <jjardon gnome org> wrote:
On 10 October 2015 at 16:12, Colin Walters <walters verbum org> wrote:
> We're at the GNOME Summit now, and I have some open topics I'd like to share
> (and while I had this mail open we started talking about it)
>
>  - Status of hwtest - it's adding some overhead, is it being used?  Owen says it's
>    not running right now
>  - Unifying build system with xdg-app;  Continuous is not production, xdg-app wants to be
>    Need to build Continuous-style runtime
>    (This is a big discussion)
>  - Installed tests state transition; after each installed tests run, report on which tests
>    started failing

Hi, I think it would be interesting to talk about these topics as well:

- Possibility to test different GNOME branches: stable and dev build
be enough I think
- Nowadays we have a mismatch between continuous and jhbuild: Should
we make continuous understand jhbuild modulesets or maybe we should
completely replace jhbuild with continuous.?


One of the things I want is a build against a test or sandbox or whatever you want to call it.  Maybe sunday night football, I don't know. :-)  But it should allow anybody to commit to it and should auto revert commits that break the build.  That way we can have a branch doesn't have as much rules of acceptance than other branches and allows for some experimentation especially for younger people who don't really understand software engineer and the work required to do put something into main line.

sri
 
Cheers,
Javier Jardón
_______________________________________________
gnome-continuous-list mailing list
gnome-continuous-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-continuous-list


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]