Re: Tags instead of components

[Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>]

On Thu, 2014-09-25 at 15:22 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> Basically, instead of a "component" string property in each component we
> have a list of tags, then the tags are used to put each component in one
> or more targets. The advantage of this is that the multi-value lets us
> avoid having a strict hierarchy of components that are used to construct
> the targets. For instance, we can drop the artificial "minimal"
> component and just list runtime *and* hwtest for the components in both
> of these.

> From a hwtest point of view, this seems fine to me - and I don't see
anything obviously wrong with the patch looking it over.

I'd claim that minimal isn't artificial - it's the set of packages that
are needed to boot the system - but I see that with your interest in
making a set of packages that *can't* boot the system but is still
useful, where it could be considered as such :-)

- Owen