Re: BonoboUnknown & G_SIGNAL_TYPE_STATIC_SCOPE

[Tim Janik <timj gtk org>]

On 4 Jan 2002, Michael Meeks wrote:

> 
> On Fri, 2002-01-04 at 02:07, Tim Janik wrote:
> > On 3 Jan 2002, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > > 	Otherwise it stays.
> > 
> > erk, and counts as definitely buggy code ;(
> 
> 	Well - now I actually look at it I see we have:
> 
> #define BONOBO_TYPE_UNKNOWN                        
> (bonobo_unknown_get_type () | G_SIGNAL_TYPE_STATIC_SCOPE)
> 
> 	and:
> 
> #define BONOBO_TYPE_NONSTATIC_UNKNOWN              
> (bonobo_unknown_get_type ())
> 
> 	So - I think this will have to stay to keep it all consistant, unless
> we make API changes, which is just tiresome.

note that this is still misleading, because BONOBO_TYPE_UNKNOWN is _not_ a
valid type id, it can only be used as signal parameter type and breaks with
all conventions we have.

>  	
> 	Hmm,
> 
> 		Michael.

---
ciaoTJ