Re: CORBA interfaces undocumented?
- From: Bill Haneman <Bill Haneman Sun COM>
- To: mathieu_lacage realmagic fr, michael ximian com
- Cc: murrayc usa net, mark skynet ie, gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: CORBA interfaces undocumented?
- Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 16:26:52 +0100 (BST)
>On Fri, 2002-03-29 at 09:32, mathieu lacage wrote:
>> I think the current point of view of the current bonobo maintainer is
>> that the CORBA interfaces are internal APIs and thus should not be
used
>> by other applications.
>
> Not true; I'm happy for people to use the CORBA APIs directly
where
>that makes sense, they are published APIs and as such frozen, stable,
>public etc.
Sounds like we're talking about the activation IDL here.
I still would very much like to see that IDL exposed
publicly since at the moment some clients have to
do nasty things like exec shell scripts/binaries
in order to do activation queries (that is, if they
can't readily use the C bindings).
-Bill
> The bonobo-activation IDL is an internal interface, the bonobo
>interfaces are for public consumption - but this doesn't always make
>that much sense. It certainly doesn't make sense to cut and paste the
>same C code all over the place to do eg. some stream writing ops, when
>you can use a single correct fragment in bonobo.
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael.
>
>--
> mmeeks gnu org <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
>
>_______________________________________________
>gnome-components-list mailing list
>gnome-components-list gnome org
>http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-components-list
------
Bill Haneman x19279
Gnome Accessibility / Batik SVG Toolkit
Sun Microsystems Ireland
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]