Re: bonobo-activation changes landed

[Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org>]

On 20Sep2001 08:19PM (-0400), Havoc Pennington wrote:
> 
> Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org> writes:
> > On 20Sep2001 02:06PM (-0400), Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > > 
> > > Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org> writes: 
> > > > I'd personally rather see one gnome 2 platform IDL directory than a
> > > > subdirectory per module. That would make it more convenient to browse
> > > > around the IDL files. Is there any reason not to do it that way?
> > > 
> > > Seems strange to me to have a supposedly gnome-independent component
> > > system install to a gnome-2.0 directory, but I don't care that much
> > > (since the component system is in practice totally gnome-dependent).
> > > 
> > > Fine with me to change it.
> > > 
> > 
> > We can wait and see if Michael has an opinion.
> > 
> 
> Since the rest of bonobo uses "gnome-2.0" etc., I'm predicting that's
> his opinion. ;-)
> 

That sounds like the way I'd like to go, then. Would you like to do
the change for bonobo-activation, or should I?

 - Maciej