Re: bonobo-activation changes landed

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org> writes:
> On 20Sep2001 02:06PM (-0400), Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > 
> > Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org> writes: 
> > > I'd personally rather see one gnome 2 platform IDL directory than a
> > > subdirectory per module. That would make it more convenient to browse
> > > around the IDL files. Is there any reason not to do it that way?
> > 
> > Seems strange to me to have a supposedly gnome-independent component
> > system install to a gnome-2.0 directory, but I don't care that much
> > (since the component system is in practice totally gnome-dependent).
> > 
> > Fine with me to change it.
> > 
> 
> We can wait and see if Michael has an opinion.
> 

Since the rest of bonobo uses "gnome-2.0" etc., I'm predicting that's
his opinion. ;-)

Havoc