Re: bonobo-activation changes landed

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org> writes: 
> I'd personally rather see one gnome 2 platform IDL directory than a
> subdirectory per module. That would make it more convenient to browse
> around the IDL files. Is there any reason not to do it that way?

Seems strange to me to have a supposedly gnome-independent component
system install to a gnome-2.0 directory, but I don't care that much
(since the component system is in practice totally gnome-dependent).

Fine with me to change it.

Havoc