Re: Where is the Bonobo::PersistStorage stock implementation?

[Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>]

Hi Gergo,

On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, ERDI Gergo wrote:
> Hey that's quite right, these `stock implementations that are in
> reality only syntactic sugar over virtual methods' are really
> unnecessary now. I just haven't realized this:)

	Good hey :-) shrinking loc is nice.

> Does this also mean the PersistFile and PersistStream implementations
> are going to be depracated? Because in that case I shouldn't bother
> trying to hack on them to support Persist:getMoniker (which is a real
> pain in the butt anyway, since to store the moniker in
> BonoboPersistPRiv, I'd have to createa BonoboPersist constructor, but
> it shouldn't be called because there is no sense in a BonoboPersist
> instance, so things get hairy there)

	They'll be deprecated yes - but the Persist base will not be I
imagine - which I assume is where the work is going in. We'll leave them
around though of course - for compatibility.

	Regards,

		Michael.

-- 
 mmeeks gnu org  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot