Re: GConf debate ... the hermenutical key.
- From: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar ximian com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Miguel de Icaza <miguel ximian com>, Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik sun com>, Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>, Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>, Glynn Foster <glynn foster sun com>, Ramiro Estrugo <ramiro fateware com>, gnome-2-0-list gnome org, gconf-list gnome org, gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GConf debate ... the hermenutical key.
- Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 01:03:55 +0200
Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Miguel de Icaza <miguel ximian com> writes:
> > > > GConf re-uses almost nothing - pointlessly re-inventing almost
> > > > everything,
>
> Can I point out that Bonobo didn't exist when I wrote this code TWO
> YEARS AGO? Or I suppose there was a thing called Bonobo but it was
> hardly anything usable I think everyone here agrees.
>
> People act like I maliciously didn't use Bonobo. Bonobo was released
> as stable only a few months ago.
>
> Anyway, since GConf was first and bonobo-config was second, I believe
> the REinvention was bonobo-config, and the invention was GConf. Thanks
> very much. ;-)
Yes, GConf was first. But what is wrong when someone tries to make things
a little better. For example we can use CORBA_any now - so there is no
longer any reason to use GConfValue.
- Dietmar
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]