Re: GConf debate ... the hermenutical key.
- From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel ximian com>
- To: Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik sun com>
- Cc: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>, Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>, Glynn Foster <glynn foster sun com>, Ramiro Estrugo <ramiro fateware com>, Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, gnome-2-0-list gnome org, gconf-list gnome org, gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GConf debate ... the hermenutical key.
- Date: 16 Jun 2001 17:42:12 -0400
> > GConf re-uses almost nothing - pointlessly re-inventing almost
> > everything, it doesn't integrate with the GNOME 2.0 platform, it needs to
> > be wrapped specialy per scripting language, it is not capable of storing
> > structured data simply, and it is a dead end IMHO. It ties nicely into the
> > 'Gtk+' platform.
> >
>
> Sorry Michael, this paragraph is pure demagogy.
Maybe the conclussion is a bit strong, but on the rest Michael is
right on the spot. Those are the reasons why we started work on
BonoboConfig.
I am sorry that you consider our reasons demagogy.
Miguel.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
