Re: Oaf patch ...
- From: Mark McLoughlin <mark skynet ie>
- To: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- Cc: <gnome-components-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Oaf patch ...
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 08:55:47 +0100 (IST)
> > @@ -221,8 +220,10 @@
> > retval = CORBA_OBJECT_NIL;
> > #ifdef OAF_DEBUG
> > if (ai.do_srv_output)
> > - g_message ("Did string_to_object on %s",
> > - ai.iorbuf);
> > + g_message ("Did string_to_object on %s = '%p' (%s)",
> > + ai.iorbuf, retval,
> > + ev->_major ==
> > CORBA_NO_EXCEPTION?
> > + "no-exception" : ev->_id);
> > #endif
> > } else {
> > OAF_GeneralError *errval;
>
> This looks good. Just out of curiosity, is ev->_id guaranteed to be a
> human-readable string, or is that just "the usual convention"? Can it be
> NULL even though ev->_major is set?
Tut, tut Michael ;) This orbit specific - should be using
CORBA_exception_id - no?
Regards,
Mark.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]