Re: An interesting hack ?
- From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel ximian com>
- To: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- Cc: gnome-components-list gnome org, Elliot Lee <sopwith redhat com>, Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Subject: Re: An interesting hack ?
- Date: 04 Feb 2001 13:35:41 -0500
All in all, the code looks beautiful, and it seems like it reduces the
ammount of boiler plate code that needs to be written by a sizable
chunk.
> a) Cannot sub-class without adding a new EPV - add a boolean on
> b_type_unique - not a major problem.
I do not understand why though.
> b) Ties us to ORBit - this is already the case, either way we
> could have configure checks for other orbs if / when.
Not a problem.
> d) The EPV struct has to be the first element in the derived
> class data - life is tough. Note you can easily add your own
> local methods and signals after this.
Couldnt this be part of the BObject structure?
I do have a couple of questions:
* How does this interact with the _construct() pattern? I
assume this is left untouched, but the signatures would
change.
* Is there any way to make this source compatible with
existing code? I am thinking here that we could just keep
the CORBA_Object argument in construct and just ignore it
completely. Maybe printing out a warning.
Best wishes,
Miguel.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]