Re: ORBit2 idl-compiler headers not installed
- From: Michael Meeks <michael peabody ximian com>
- To: Sam Couter <sam topic com au>
- Cc: <orbit-list gnome org>, Murray Cumming <murrayc usa net>, <gnome-components-list gnome org>, Mark McLoughlin <mark skynet ie>
- Subject: Re: ORBit2 idl-compiler headers not installed
- Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2001 14:44:40 -0500 (EST)
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Sam Couter wrote:
> Michael Meeks <michael peabody ximian com> wrote:
> > Fair comments in fact :-) I think we stripped the 'backend'
> > capability in it's shlib form from orbit-idl in the last revision.
>
> Erm... That could be bad. Why was that done?
I think because the framework was overly complicated and
substantialy unused :-) it'd be best to fold the C++ work into ORBit2
anyway IMHO - is it your project Sam ?
> The ORBit-C++ compiler backend is written in C++, so it would at least
> introduce the dependency on a C++ compiler and runtime.
There's no real need for that in the idl compiler; I'm sure it can
be ported to C with relative ease. Are you interested in doing that ? or
do you have a URL for the latest source to hand (I'm being lazy).
> The current version of ORBit-C++ also provides a C++ mapping of the
> CORBA spec, so there is a library to provide the POA, some operations
> on Anys, sequences and so on, as well as a CosNaming library.
The good news is that we can (most probably) auto-generate a good
deal of that, since much of the ORB interface is now defined via PIDL -
which we could just compile with the C++ IDL compiler to produce nice
headers for the whole thing - how does that sound ?
Regards,
Michael.
--
mmeeks gnu org <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]