Re: [GNOME VFS] Re: GUADEC Issue discussion summary ...
- From: ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org>
- To: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>, gnome-components-list gnome org, gnome-vfs ximian com
- Subject: Re: [GNOME VFS] Re: GUADEC Issue discussion summary ...
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 17:35:33 +0200 (CEST)
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Of course, I can understand your reluctance to depend on bonobo,
> but we could have a separate module as you suggest - but I think module
> proliferation is rather sub-optimal.
Now that Bonobo is part of the GNOME platform and it is past 1.0, and it
will form a very foundational part of GNOME2, I would not understand why
someone would be reluctant to depend on Bonobo. So if not to Michael,
could you explain it to me?
--
.--= ULLA! =---------------------. `We are not here to give users what
\ http://cactus.rulez.org \ they want' -- RMS, at GUADEC 2001
`---= cactus cactus rulez org =---'
I had my car's alignment checked. It's chaotic evil!
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]