Re: [GNOME VFS] Re: GUADEC Issue discussion summary ...
- From: Joe Shaw <joe ximian com>
- To: ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org>
- Cc: gnome-components-list gnome org, gnome-vfs ximian com
- Subject: Re: [GNOME VFS] Re: GUADEC Issue discussion summary ...
- Date: 19 Apr 2001 17:26:28 -0400
> Now that Bonobo is part of the GNOME platform and it is past 1.0, and it
> will form a very foundational part of GNOME2, I would not understand why
> someone would be reluctant to depend on Bonobo. So if not to Michael,
> could you explain it to me?
I think his point is not that people would generally be reluctant to
depend on bonobo but rather that there seems to be some uncertainty as
to how gnome-vfs and bonobo co-exist in the platform. Is gnome-vfs a
higher-level library than bonobo or the other way around? My personal
feeling is that gnome-vfs is higher-level than bonobo and should depend
upon it, but I can definitely see how one would feel that a vfs layer is
lower level than the component architecture.
Joe
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]