Re: review of the Storage interface
- From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel helixcode com>
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>
- Cc: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar maurer-it com>, "gnome-components-list gnome org" <gnome-components-list gnome org>, mmeeks gnu org
- Subject: Re: review of the Storage interface
- Date: 10 Sep 2000 22:06:44 -0400
> > I don't like to freeze the current API because I think it is incomplete.
>
> Lots of things in Bonobo could be even better than they are.
Yeah, but these changes affect no existing applications and would
allow for a good infrastructure to be put in place.
> However, it's not even true that we can make any of these changes
> without affecting anything else. For instance, Nautilus has a server
> that implements the Stream interface to use with Bonobo Controls and
> Embeddables which we use to display content in Nautilus. We'd have to
> make a lot of changes to that code to support all the things you want,
> and it would be very difficult to test our changes, since no Bonobo
> components out there use any of this functionality right now (since it
> doesn't exist yet).
We are talking about Storages, not Streams.
> Do you think that all the changes you suggested are important enough
> that we should delay shipping GNOME 1.4 for an unknown but possibly
> quite long length of time to get them in, and even then risk shipping
> a buggier GNOME 1.4? Are they also worth delaying GNOME 2.0, the
> long-awaited and long-delayed development platform update, since many
> people will not start working on GNOME 2.0 in earnest until GNOME 1.4
> has shipped?
Yes.
Miguel.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]