RE: equation editors and TeX (long) (was "Equation Editor")
- From: Sri Ramkrishna <sri aracnet com>
- To: Martin Sevior <msevior mccubbin ph unimelb edu au>
- Cc: Paul Topping <PaulT mathtype com>, "'gnome-components-list gnome org'" <gnome-components-list gnome org>
- Subject: RE: equation editors and TeX (long) (was "Equation Editor")
- Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 14:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
> I've done some more checking and there is a lot of momentum behind MathML.
> Amaya can already directly edit MathML into their web browser. Both IE and
> Mozilla have plans to display MathML. MathML can be directly translated by
> expat 1.1 and libXML 2.0. There a lot of projects to display MathML we can
> borrow code from. MathML 2.0 has just been approved and there is a project
> in Italy to display advanced Math using MathML 2.0. They even have a gtk
> widget to do it. We can steal any or all of this code as it is all GPL or
> freer. In short I am extremely comfortable with MathML as our internal
> representation of Maths in Abiword.
I have a question. Are you using MathML for _rendering_? Frankly, from
the examples I saw of MathML I find it rather difficult to use compared to
say LaTeX. For instance:
<mrow>
<mrow>
<msup>
<mi>x</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mo>+</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>4</mn>
<mo>⁢</mo>
<mi>x</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>+</mo>
<mn>4</mn>
</mrow>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>0</mn>
</mrow>
It feels overly wordy with an overuse of tags. However, I have not used
MathML and this is my first exposure. Perhaps you could expand on how you
plan on using MathML a little further?
sri
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]