Re: where to put tar storage object...

[Chipzz <chipzz ULYSSIS Org>]

On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Dietmar Maurer wrote:

> From: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar maurer-it com>
> Subject: Re: where to put tar storage object...
> 
> I think it should be a storage module. But there is a design conflict -
> we have to redesign/extend the plugin system to make this work (some
> storage's
> are able to work on bonobo streams)
> 
> We should also add storage drivers for http and ftp to the storage
> modules
> directory (does they exist somewhere?).

How about glibwww? Or w3c-libwww is beyond the scope of this?

> And maybe it is possible to make the untar moniker a little bit more
> generic, so that it can handle several archive formats (efs, tar, zip -
> if
> we have an appropriate storage module).
> 
> Should we move the moniker test to the test sub directory?

Greeings,

Chipzz AKA
Jan Van Buggenhout
-- 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  UNIX isn't dead - It just smells funny
                            Chipzz ULYSSIS Org
--------------------------------------------------------------------------