Re: g_idle killer ...



> Oops, I already replied to the previous version of this patch. Anyway,
> I don't think using an idle handler like this is appropriate; number
> of passes through the idle loop is a completely arbitrary and
> unpredicatable condition. While a fixed timout is somewhat arbitrary
> too, I think I would like it better. 

Yeah, I agree completely.

Miguel.




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]