Re: choice of ORB

[Miguel de Icaza <miguel nuclecu unam mx>]

> I was wondering why mico was chosen as the ORB for GNOME when omniORB2
> is faster [according to Linas Vespas, at least], also GPL'ed, and has
> ongoing support from the commercial sector.

A couple of things are missing from omniORB2 which are present on
MICO: different activation policies in the boa;  and the DII/DSI
support is lacking in omniORB2.

We might replace MICO soon with a C-based ORB as the MICO generated
stubs are too big and too slow. 

Miguel.