Re: Reduce autoconf requirement

[Richard Hughes <hughsient gmail com>]

On 8 February 2010 22:23, Andrew Lutomirski <amluto gmail com> wrote:
> For kicks, I just grabbed gnome-color-manager out of git, built it,
> and ran it on KDE4 on Fedora 12.  (why not?)  It seems to work (I
> haven't tested its Argyll integration yet.)

Sure, it should work.

> To make it build, though, I had to decrease the autoconf required
> version, like this:
>
> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> index bf4e31f..d4f422b 100644
> --- a/configure.ac
> +++ b/configure.ac
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -AC_PREREQ(2.65)
> +AC_PREREQ(2.63)
>
>  AC_INIT([gnome-color-manager],[2.29.4],[http://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=gnome-color-manager])
>  AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR(src)

The 2.63 BR was from autoupdate'ing the scripts.

> Is there any reason we require autogen 2.65?  2.63 from F12 seems to
> work just fine.

If it works, great!

> shared-color-targets needs the same patch.

Will do.

> As an aside, what's the profile graph on the right?  Is it the
> calibration (VCGT), the gray axis of the profile, or something else?
> (I assume it's not the gray axis -- it doesn't really look like
> xicclu's output.)

I think we need graph labels in this case. It's actually the TRC.

Richard.