Hey Philip,
> it was pretty much going to happen unless something went drastically wrong
Not sure I would say it with those words, but yes, we are in the same
situation as it was before and things keep progressing well.
But this has to come with community built-in, and not only I cannot
control that, but it's also hard to quantify. So I don't really want
to commit myself into an answer for that as for now, it depends on all
of you, specially those in the pilot program giving feedback to us and
the rest of the community. I'll keep doing my best trying to quantify
the community agreement/satisfaction (+ all the technical part and
discussion with GitLab people about our priorities, etc. of course).
Hope is clearer now, or at least know why I cannot be clearer :)
OK. I have been doing some research and was planning to spend some effort creating a proper CI pipeline for merge requests and releases after GJS gets moved over, and I had a momentary panic about whether it would be wise to spend that time when it's unclear if we're staying with Gitlab.
