Re: GitLab: Default set of status/resolutions/labels for GNOME

[Carlos Soriano <csoriano gnome org>]

I see. Don't panic :)

Lot of us have been doing different works and are quite excited in
general: for example Alex have been setting up CI for Flatpak builds
and we enabled a server with privileges for this reason too, I
received more request for the pilot program than we can handle, I
receive positive outside and internal feedback, etc.

I just want to make sure everyone knows the option to not move exists,
and all depends on you and your feedback.

Best
--
Carlos Soriano
GNOME Foundation
Treasurer, Board of Directors


On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 2:05 AM,  <philip chimento gmail com> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 3:20 PM Carlos Soriano <csoriano gnome org> wrote:
> > Hey Philip,
> >
> > > it was pretty much going to happen unless something went drastically
> > > wrong
> >
> > Not sure I would say it with those words, but yes, we are in the same
> > situation as it was before and things keep progressing well.
> >
> > But this has to come with community built-in, and not only I cannot
> > control that, but it's also hard to quantify. So I don't really want
> > to commit myself into an answer for that as for now, it depends on all
> > of you, specially those in the pilot program giving feedback to us and
> > the rest of the community. I'll keep doing my best trying to quantify
> > the community agreement/satisfaction (+ all the technical part and
> > discussion with GitLab people about our priorities, etc. of course).
> >
> > Hope is clearer now, or at least know why I cannot be clearer :)
>
>
> OK. I have been doing some research and was planning to spend some effort
> creating a proper CI pipeline for merge requests and releases after GJS gets
> moved over, and I had a momentary panic about whether it would be wise to
> spend that time when it's unclear if we're staying with Gitlab.