Re: BugSquad Meeting Minutes -- 2009-10/09

[Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net>]

Am Donnerstag, den 22.10.2009, 18:43 +0100 schrieb Tobias Mueller:
> On 22.10.2009 12:01, Andre Klapper wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 22.10.2009, 09:18 +0100 schrieb Tobias Mueller:
> >> Something GNOME 3.0 related might be catchy. Maybe smth like "Have no
> >> UNCOMFIRMED bug against bonobo/glade/$deprecated"...
> > 
> > Why spend time on deprecated stuff?
> Because it's a GNOME-3.0 related thing (i.e. get rid of deprecated
> stuff) and it might have a positive effect on people who consider to
> attend the bugday.
> I don't mind a better idea of course ;-)

I still don't totally get why this is not a waste of time at the current
state we're in. :-)

So what to do with the UNCONFIRMED bugs?
Ask people to confirm them for a product that will die soon anyway?
Ask people to try to reproduce in 2.28, which still partially uses those
old products? If so, why, if that will die anyway and we will see some
new bugs (or the same bugs, but for different technical reasons)?

andre
-- 
 mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed
 http://www.iomc.de/  | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper