Re: Bugsquad Meeting Minutes 2009-09-05
- From: Tobias Mueller <muelli auftrags-killer org>
- To: gnome-bugsquad gnome org
- Subject: Re: Bugsquad Meeting Minutes 2009-09-05
- Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 03:19:07 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Aloha! :-)
I just wanted to keep you updated on the open issues from the last meeting:
On 06.09.2009 00:16, Tobias Mueller wrote:
> == "Old untouched bugs" ==
> [..,]
> ACTIONS:
> - JavierJardon to open a bug (Done:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=594259)
> - TobiasMueller to sync stock response to TriageGuide and
> StockResponses (don't forget to mention "needinfo-trynewversion"
> Keyword)
>
DONE! :-)
> == Make more clear the triager workflow ==
> [...]
>
> ACTIONS:
> - JavierJardon to add diagram to TriageGuide (DONE)
> - AkhilLadda to enhance the diagram by some rough guidelines on, e.g.,
> when to set to NEW
>
Not yet
> == Set up a bot to notify us about new bugs in #bugs ==
> [,,,[
> ACTIONS:
> - TobiasMueller to mention #bzbot and #bugs in the BugSquad page.
> (DONE)
> - JavierJardon to fix pages shown up in [1] and [2] (DONE)
> - TobiasMueller to update FindingDuplicates to mention the new s-d-f
> replacement (TODO: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=594272)
>
DONE
> == Refactor ProductSpecificGuidelines ==
> We have a bloated page at
> http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/TriageGuide/ProductSpecificGuidelines
> with many rules to obey.
> But simply deleting isn't an option because the information is actually
> necessary. So try to get rid of unneccessary rules such as "If possible
> get a backtrace from the user with all thread backtraces (i.e. using 'bt
> thread apply all' instead of 'bt' in GDB)".
>
> We thus ask the maintainers to have a look at
> http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/TriageGuide/ProductSpecificGuidelines and
> clean their stuff up.
>
> ACTIONS:
> - TobiasMueller to write a mail to be send to maintainers or d-d-l to
> ask for reviewing their rules. (GnomeBug:594243)
> - Someone to send that mail
>
Mail proposal follows
Dear Maintainers :)
We, the Bugsquad, wonder, how accurate the Product Specific Instructions
on live.gnome.org currently are. You can find the at
http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/TriageGuide/ProductSpecificGuidelines and
we kindly ask you to revisit the rules for your module.
For example it's not needed to ask for a stacktrace (of all threads)
because we ask the user to do that anyway
(http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces/Details).
Requesting output from a special program (xrandr, gconf, ...) or a log
is a good idea though.
So please visit
http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/TriageGuide/ProductSpecificGuidelines and
help us getting the most out of our bugreports :)
Thanks,
Tobi
for the GNOME Bugsquad
> == Bugsquad module in bugzilla ==
> It might be a good thing to have an own module to keep track of assigned
> tasks.
>
> ACTIONS:
> - TobiasMueller to file a bug against bugzilla.gnome.org/products
> (DONE: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=594245)
>
And we finally have our product :)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/browse.cgi?product=bugsquad
We actually try to use it as a ToDo tracker. It'll hopefully work out.
At least it's harder to forget things. Tracking todos via email is not
that easy (for me).
> The meeting ended after three hours, the rest of the agenda is deferred:
> 7. New project: BugsquadGoals
> 8. Report conclusions here: [[Bugsquad/DirectiveDiscussion]]
> 9. Future of Bugsquad/BugDays
> 10. Mail Notifications
> 11. Automatic CANEDIT permissions
> 12. Enable votes in Bugzilla or a method to say "this bugs affects me"
>
We'll see how much we'll get done on our next meeting ;-)
Cheers,
Tobi
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkrP7xIACgkQPuBX/6ogjZ71eACfXUs/G81L1VLzmXvooX/rvTl3
GHoAnjLUwqC5XW+gb6L7OG/7z0W8F9hN
=VUbR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]