Re: Bugsquad 2009-08-03 meeting minutes

[Leo Jackson <lajjr yahoo com>]

Andre,

Yes a dead line is needed +1
Regards,

Leo Albert Jackson Jr
lajjr

--- On Sun, 8/9/09, Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net> wrote:

> From: Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net>
> Subject: Re: Bugsquad 2009-08-03 meeting minutes
> To: gnome-bugsquad gnome org
> Date: Sunday, August 9, 2009, 5:06 PM
> Am Dienstag, den 04.08.2009, 17:50
> +0100 schrieb Philip Withnall:
> > Andre: By "updates", do we mean "releases" or
> "commits"? It might be an
> > idea to clarify in the e-mail.
> 
> I'd go with commits here.
> 
> > Andre: Do we want to mention a deadline for replying
> to the e-mail, and
> > say that if the maintainers don't reply by that date
> then it'll be
> > assumed their module is dead?
> 
> Hmm. I think I was initially against this. E-mail is quite
> error-prone.
> But a "Please do respond within the next four weeks."
> should be fine.
> After that I'd probably try again and then close tickets.
> 
> andre
> -- 
>  mailto:ak-47 gmx net |
> failed
>  http://www.iomc.de/ ; | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnome-bugsquad mailing list
> Gnome-bugsquad gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad
>