Am Dienstag, den 11.03.2008, 18:50 +0100 schrieb Olav Vitters: > Currently Bug Buddy bugs are only accepted for GNOME 2.18 and newer. I > suggest to change this to 2.20. Meaning: don't accept anything older. i'm looking forward to this because especially fedora7 triggered lots of useless 2.18 reports. i propose to start rejecting 2.18 reports on april 9 (2.22.1 release date), but there isn't any reason for this - definitely feel free to ignore. :-) do we display anything to the user who tries to submit a report from 2.16? i'd feel much better if bug-buddy presented a friendly "too old, nobody interested and nobody working on it anymore; complain to your distro instead" hint to the "blocked" reporter instead of a cryptic "995 too old" error string or whatever i remember about this topic... > This > is for Feb 10 onwards, potentially reducing the incoming bugrate with > ~700 bugs/week maximum. This as they will often go to crash.gnome.org > instead (2.20+). ...where they rot away without any feedback or even maintainers knowing about crash.gnome.org, because it's unusable in its current state. but that's a totally different topic. andre -- mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil